PRAVEEN RAMSAJEEVAN PADNEY vs UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT — HCBM20059342026

Case under Private Security Guards (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act (Maharashtra) Section 226. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Next hearing 15-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM020059342026

Filing Number

PIL/5934/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad

Coram

Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad

Bench Type

Division

Category

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION/LETTER PETITIONS ( 32 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Private Security Guards (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act (Maharashtra) Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRAVEEN RAMSAJEEVAN PADNEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT

  2. 2.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY

  3. 3.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

  4. 4.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

  5. 5.THE CHAIRMAN MAHARASHTRA PRIVATE SECURITY GUARD BOARD

  6. 6.THE COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR

  7. 7.G4S SECURE SOLUTIONS (I) PVT LTD (G4S) THROUGH ITS COUNTRY MANAGING DIRECTOR MR RAJEEV SHARMA

  8. 8.MR RAJEEV SHARMA COUNTRY MANAGING DIRECTOR

  9. 9.THE REGIONAL COMMISSIONER EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-Jul-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Acting Chief Justice,hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. AnkhadView PDF

    SUMMARY: Due to paucity of time on 15th June 2026, the Bombay High Court could not hear matters listed before it. The Court adjourned multiple cases with directions: office objections must be removed within two weeks; affidavits in reply/rejoinder must be filed one week before next hearing; petitioner must supply spare copies within 14 days or matters risk dismissal; and various matters were listed for fresh admission, urgent admission, and due admission hearings between 10-22 July 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: Due to paucity of time on 15th June 2026, the Bombay High Court could not hear matters listed before it. The Court adjourned multiple cases with directions: office objections must be removed within two weeks; affidavits in reply/rejoinder must be filed one week before next hearing; petitioner must supply spare copies within 14 days or matters risk dismissal; and various matters were listed for fresh admission, urgent admission, and due admission hearings between 10-22 July 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case