COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION 4 MUMBAI SHILPA GOEL vs REFINITIV REUTERS LIMITED A Y 2006 07 — HCBM20059182025
Case under Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 260A. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM020059182025
e-Filing Number
22-02-2025
Filing Number
ITXA/5917/2025
Filing Date
24-Feb-2025
Judge
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Coram
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION 4 MUMBAI SHILPA GOEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.REFINITIV REUTERS LIMITED A Y 2006 07
Case History
-
08-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-May-2026
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF
The Bombay High Court granted the appellant a final opportunity to remove office objections on three Income Tax Appeals (ITXA(L)/5105/2025, ITXA(L)/5885/2025, and ITXA(L)/5917/2025) and register them within two weeks from the outcome of pending Interim Applications for condonation of delay. The appeals will stand rejected for non-compliance with O.S. Rule 986 if the appellant fails to comply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
For Rejection Under Rule 986
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
-
24-Feb-2025
Case filed
The Bombay High Court granted the appellant a final opportunity to remove office objections on three Income Tax Appeals (ITXA(L)/5105/2025, ITXA(L)/5885/2025, and ITXA(L)/5917/2025) and register them within two weeks from the outcome of pending Interim Applications for condonation of delay. The appeals will stand rejected for non-compliance with O.S. Rule 986 if the appellant fails to comply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts