Viswanathan Ramani vs Viswanathan Ramani — TP/2218/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 278. Next hearing: 07th August 2026.

Next hearing 07-Aug-2026

CNR: HCBM020058632026

e-Filing Number

16-02-2026

Filing Number

TP/5863/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

TP/2218/2026

Registration Date

20-Apr-2026

Judge

Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department

Coram

Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Letters of Administration without Will ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 278

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Viswanathan Ramani

    Adv. ADV BHARATI NEGI

  2. 2.Mahalakshmi Ramani

    Adv. BHARATI NEGI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Viswanathan Ramani

Case History

  1. 07-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Aug-2026

    For Direction

    Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department

  3. 05-May-2026

    Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF

    Case Summary: TP/2218/2026 The court adjourned the testamentary petition and directed the petitioner's advocate to issue citations within two weeks and comply with procedural requirements under BHC Rules, including submitting Schedule-I to the Collector, notifying non-consenting legal heirs, furnishing an administration bond for the gross amount, and explaining any delay. The case was stood over to 06.08.2026 for further proceedings, with the office to verify if any cross-petitions were filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 05-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2218/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TP/2218/2026 The court adjourned the testamentary petition and directed the petitioner's advocate to issue citations within two weeks and comply with procedural requirements under BHC Rules, including submitting Schedule-I to the Collector, notifying non-consenting legal heirs, furnishing an administration bond for the gross amount, and explaining any delay. The case was stood over to 06.08.2026 for further proceedings, with the office to verify if any cross-petitions were filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case