SHRIRAM CITY UNION FINANCE LTD. vs RIYA K DOSHI — EXA/1753/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020058472021

Filing Number

EXA/5816/2021

Filing Date

01-Mar-2021

Registration No

EXA/1753/2023

Registration Date

30-Oct-2023

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRIRAM CITY UNION FINANCE LTD.

    Adv. DR SAIKUMAR PATHRUDU M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RIYA K DOSHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple applications (Serial Nos. 902-1169) and set aside all related arbitral awards, finding that the sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, relying on the Supreme Court's decision in *Bhadra International* that such unilateral appointments are void ab initio. The court allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the period of prior arbitration excluded from limitation, unless the parties had expressly waived the arbitrator's ineligibility in writing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 29-Sep-2023

    Shri. S. B. Bhansali (Prothonotary Senior Master))View PDF

  5. 29-Sep-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 01-Mar-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/1753/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple applications (Serial Nos. 902-1169) and set aside all related arbitral awards, finding that the sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, relying on the Supreme Court's decision in *Bhadra International* that such unilateral appointments are void ab initio. The court allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the period of prior arbitration excluded from limitation, unless the parties had expressly waived the arbitrator's ineligibility in writing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case