COROMANDEL INTERNATIONAL LTD. HSA Advocates vs NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Advocate - ASIM VIDYARTHI — COMEX/29/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 11(2). Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM020057002021
Filing Number
COMEX/5670/2021
Filing Date
26-Feb-2021
Registration No
COMEX/29/2021
Registration Date
07-Jul-2021
Judge
Mrs.Maheshwari Parkar, Taxing Master
Coram
Mrs.Maheshwari Parkar, Taxing Master
Bench Type
Single
Category
EXECUTION ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.COROMANDEL INTERNATIONAL LTD. HSA Advocates
Respondent(s)
-
1.NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Advocate - ASIM VIDYARTHI
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
06-May-2026
Mrs.Maheshwari Parkar, Taxing MasterView PDF
Case Summary: In IA 2657 of 2022 (COMEX 29/2021), the Taxing Master accepted a bank guarantee of Rs. 2,58,18,131/- issued by State Bank of India, Chennai Branch, submitted by Coromandel International Ltd. The bank guarantee, valid until April 2, 2027, contained a restricted claim period clause in its covering letter. The court directed the office to accept the guarantee and ordered service upon the respondent within one week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Apr-2026
Mrs.Maheshwari Parkar, Taxing MasterView PDF
-
29-Apr-2026
For Acceptance
Mrs.Maheshwari Parkar, Taxing Master
-
15-Apr-2026
Mrs.Maheshwari Parkar, Taxing MasterView PDF
-
26-Mar-2025
Mrs.Maheshwari Parkar, Taxing MasterView PDF
-
03-Apr-2024
Mrs. K.Y. Ambekar, Taxing MasterView PDF
-
22-Jun-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Apr-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish PitaleView PDF
-
11-Apr-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish PitaleView PDF
-
26-Feb-2021
Case filed
Registration No. COMEX/29/2021
Case Summary: In IA 2657 of 2022 (COMEX 29/2021), the Taxing Master accepted a bank guarantee of Rs. 2,58,18,131/- issued by State Bank of India, Chennai Branch, submitted by Coromandel International Ltd. The bank guarantee, valid until April 2, 2027, contained a restricted claim period clause in its covering letter. The court directed the office to accept the guarantee and ordered service upon the respondent within one week. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts