Kanhaiya Shringar Through its Proprietor Chandan Kumar vs Manoj Gosai — IA/1844/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section OrderVIIIRule1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020056872026

e-Filing Number

14-02-2026

Filing Number

IA/5687/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

IA/1844/2026

Registration Date

02-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section OrderVIIIRule1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kanhaiya Shringar Through its Proprietor Chandan Kumar

    Adv. PRASHANT KASHINATH AHER

  2. 2.Priya Joshi proprietor of Ladlee Shringar

    Adv. AHER PRASHANT KASHINATH

  3. 3.Nagoji Manihari Through its Proprietor Nagendra Gupta

    Adv. AHER PRASHANT KASHINATH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Manoj Gosai

  2. 2.Jintendra Kumar Goswami Proprietor of Goswami General Stores

  3. 3.Saroj Gosai proprietor of Saroj Trading

  4. 4.Gajendra Kumar Sah

  5. 5.Pari General Stores

  6. 6.Manoj Kumar Purbe proprietor of Pushpanjali General Stores

  7. 7.Vijay Kumar Das Proprietor of Vijay Manihari Store

  8. 8.Prawin Kumar Proprietor of Simran Praveen Kumar

  9. 9.Chandan Kumar Proprietor of Aaradhna Shringaar

  10. 10.Munna Manihari

  11. 11.Pariwar Shringar

  12. 12.Kesari Manihari AKA Ashish Kumar Kesari

  13. 13.Sarvan Manihari Aka Shravan Poddar

  14. 14.Ashok Kumar Proprietor of Sumit Shringar Gift House

  15. 15.Vicky Kumar Proprietor of Vicky General Stores

  16. 16.Krishna Kumar Proprietor of Suhag General Stores

  17. 17.Shyam Sundar Prasad Proprietor of Soni Shringar

  18. 18.Shrawan Gosai Proprietor of AKA Shrawan Gami Shrawan General Store

  19. 19.Surender Singh Maniyar

  20. 20.Gautam Kumar Saha Proprietor of Gautam General Stores

  21. 21.Sunil Proprietor of Sunil Stores

  22. 22.Dhananjay proprietor of Dhananjay UIP Ladies Corner

  23. 23.Ajay Kumar Patwa UIP Corner

  24. 24.Bitu Kumar Gupta

  25. 25.Dilip Patwa

  26. 26.Tabrez Alam proprietor of New Varities Ladies Corner

  27. 27.Chandan Kumar Proprietor of Chandan Cosmetics

  28. 28.Prem Kumar Proprietor of Rajesh VIP Ladies Corner

  29. 29.Arvind Kumar Proprietor of Mahalaxmi Shringar

  30. 30.Sitaram Mahto

  31. 31.Jaseem Manihala Store

  32. 32.Marico Limited

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

    Case Summary: The Bombay High Court's Commercial Division allowed an interim application by three retail defendants (Kanhaiya Shringar, Ladlee Shringar, and Nagoji Manihari) seeking condonation of 93 days' delay in filing their written statement in a trademark/IP suit filed by Marico Limited. The court accepted their explanation that, as small shop retailers unfamiliar with English-language legal proceedings, they required time to engage legal counsel, and since the written statement was filed within the outer 120-day limit, the delay was condoned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

  4. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/1844/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Bombay High Court's Commercial Division allowed an interim application by three retail defendants (Kanhaiya Shringar, Ladlee Shringar, and Nagoji Manihari) seeking condonation of 93 days' delay in filing their written statement in a trademark/IP suit filed by Marico Limited. The court accepted their explanation that, as small shop retailers unfamiliar with English-language legal proceedings, they required time to engage legal counsel, and since the written statement was filed within the outer 120-day limit, the delay was condoned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case