Sitaram Viranchi Mahto vs Manoj Gosai — IA/1001/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section XXXIXRules1,2,3and5section151. Disposed: --DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020056792026

e-Filing Number

14-02-2026

Filing Number

IA/5679/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

IA/1001/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section XXXIXRules1,2,3and5section151

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sitaram Viranchi Mahto

    Adv. PRASHANT KASHINATH AHER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Manoj Gosai

  2. 2.Jintendra Kumar Goswami Proprietor of Goswami General Stores

  3. 3.Saroj Gosai proprietor of Saroj Trading

  4. 4.Gajendra Kumar Sah

  5. 5.Pari General Stores

  6. 6.Manoj Kumar Purbe proprietor of Pushpanjali General Stores

  7. 7.Vijay Kumar Das Proprietor of Vijay Manihari Store

  8. 8.Prawin Kumar Proprietor of Simran Praveen Kumar So Shankar Prasad Bhagat Simran Cosmetics

  9. 9.Chandan Kumar Proprietor of Aaradhna Shringaar

  10. 10.Munna Manihari

  11. 11.Pariwar Shringar

  12. 12.Kesari Manihari AKA Ashish Kumar Kesari

  13. 13.Sarvan Manihari Aka Shravan Poddar So Ramji Poddar

  14. 14.Ashok Kumar Proprietor of Sumit Shringar Gift House

  15. 15.Vicky Kumar Proprietor of Vicky General Stores

  16. 16.Krishna Kumar Proprietor of Suhag General Stores

  17. 17.Shyam Sundar Prasad Proprietor of Soni Shringar

  18. 18.Shrawan Gosai Proprietor of AKA Shrawan Gami Shrawan General Store

  19. 19.Surender Singh Maniyar

  20. 20.Gautam Kumar Saha Proprietor of Gautam General Stores

  21. 21.Sunil Proprietor of Sunil Stores

  22. 22.Dhananjay proprietor of Dhananjay UIP Ladies Corner

  23. 23.Ajay Kumar Patwa UIP Corner

  24. 24.Bitu Kumar Gupta

  25. 25.Dilip Patwa

  26. 26.Tabrez Alam proprietor of New Varities Ladies Corner

  27. 27.Chandan Kumar Proprietor of Chandan Cosmetics

  28. 28.Prem Kumar Proprietor of Rajesh VIP Ladies Corner

  29. 29.Kanhaiya Shringar

  30. 30.Priy Joshi proprietor of Ladlee Shringar

  31. 31.Arvind Kumar Proprietor of Mahalaxmi Shringar

  32. 32.Nagoji Manihari

  33. 33.Jaseem Manihala Store

  34. 34.Marico Limited

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

    Summary: The Bombay High Court allowed defendant Sitaram Viranchi Mahto's interim application seeking condonation of 106 days' delay in filing a written statement in a commercial IP suit filed by Marico Limited. The court accepted the defendant's explanation that language barriers (proceedings in English) and time required to engage legal counsel justified the delay, particularly given the defendant operated a small retail shop. The written statement was filed within the permissible 120-day outer limit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/1001/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Bombay High Court allowed defendant Sitaram Viranchi Mahto's interim application seeking condonation of 106 days' delay in filing a written statement in a commercial IP suit filed by Marico Limited. The court accepted the defendant's explanation that language barriers (proceedings in English) and time required to engage legal counsel justified the delay, particularly given the defendant operated a small retail shop. The written statement was filed within the permissible 120-day outer limit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case