RAJEEV MANMOHAN GUPTA vs The Registrar of Trade Marks Advocate - sagar ambedkar, ,sagar ambedkar,sagar ambedkar — HCBM20056482025

Case under Trade Marks Act Section section25. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM020056482025

Next Hearing

15th April 2026

e-Filing Number

20-02-2025

Filing Number

WP/5648/2025

Filing Date

21-02-2025

Judge

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Coram

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Bench Type

Division

Category

MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )

Sub-Category

TRADE MARKS ( 20 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Acts & Sections

Trade Marks Act Section section25

Petitioner(s)

RAJEEV MANMOHAN GUPTA

Adv. Advocate- ,HETAL PATEL

SANJIV MANMOHAN GUPTA

Adv. Mahesh Mahadgut

Respondent(s)

The Registrar of Trade Marks Advocate - sagar ambedkar, ,sagar ambedkar,sagar ambedkar

Union of India

Adv. sagar ambedkar

SNEHLATA MANMOHAN GUPTA

RITA RAKESH PUROHIT

Hearing History

Judge: Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

28-02-2025

FRESH ADMISSION

20-03-2025

FRESH ADMISSION

17-04-2025

DUE ADMISSION - 1

13-06-2025

DUE ADMISSION - 1

10-07-2025

DUE ADMISSION - 1

Orders

15-04-2026
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Summary: The High Court of Bombay granted petitioners a final opportunity to remove office objections from six writ petitions (WP(L)/5513/2025, WP(L)/5546/2025, WP(L)/5600/2025, WP(L)/5648/2025, WP(L)/5867/2025, and WP(L)/5899/2025) and file compliance by April 29, 2026. Failure to comply will result in automatic rejection of all petitions for non-compliance with O.S. Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Bombay granted petitioners a final opportunity to remove office objections from six writ petitions (WP(L)/5513/2025, WP(L)/5546/2025, WP(L)/5600/2025, WP(L)/5648/2025, WP(L)/5867/2025, and WP(L)/5899/2025) and file compliance by April 29, 2026. Failure to comply will result in automatic rejection of all petitions for non-compliance with O.S. Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case