SUPREME HYDRO ENGINEERING PVT LTD vs MICRO SMALL ENTERPRISE FACILITATION COUNCIL, KOKAN — HCBM20055512025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.

Next hearing 15-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM020055512025

Filing Number

WP/5552/2025

Filing Date

20-Feb-2025

Judge

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Coram

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Bench Type

Single

Category

INDIRECT TAXES ( 17 )

Sub-Category

GST Goods and Services Tax ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Micro, Small & Medium Enterprise Dev. Act Section 1
Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council Rules, 2016 (Maharashtra) Section 1
Goods and Services Tax Act (Maharashtra) Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUPREME HYDRO ENGINEERING PVT LTD

    Adv. HIMANSHU VIDHANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MICRO SMALL ENTERPRISE FACILITATION COUNCIL, KOKAN

  2. 2.PARAM OFFSHORE SERVICE PVT LTD

Case History

  1. 15-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

    Summary: The Bombay High Court has given petitioners a final opportunity to remove office objections on eight writ petitions and obtain registration/numbering by filing a compliance praecipe on or before April 29, 2026. Failure to comply will result in automatic rejection of all writ petitions for non-compliance with O.S. Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    For Rejection Under Rule 986

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

  4. 20-Feb-2025

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Bombay High Court has given petitioners a final opportunity to remove office objections on eight writ petitions and obtain registration/numbering by filing a compliance praecipe on or before April 29, 2026. Failure to comply will result in automatic rejection of all writ petitions for non-compliance with O.S. Rule 986. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case