Onkar Arvind Kher LAKDAWALA AND COMPANY vs Arvind Shankar Kher — TP/1489/2026
Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM020054842026
e-Filing Number
12-02-2026
Filing Number
TP/5483/2026
Filing Date
13-Feb-2026
Registration No
TP/1489/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Judge
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
Coram
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
Bench Type
Single
Category
TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )
Sub-Category
Probate ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Onkar Arvind Kher LAKDAWALA AND COMPANY
Respondent(s)
-
1.Arvind Shankar Kher
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
08-May-2026
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF
Case Summary: TP/1489/2026 The petition for probate of the last Will and Testament of deceased Arvind Shankar Kher, filed by his son Onkar Arvind Kher (the named Executor), was GRANTED on 8th May 2026. All legal formalities were satisfied including the petitioner's oath, attesting witness affidavit, consent from the widow and daughter, and proper service of citation. The office was directed to issue Probate after verifying no cross petitions or caveats were filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
For Direction
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
-
13-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. TP/1489/2026
Case Summary: TP/1489/2026 The petition for probate of the last Will and Testament of deceased Arvind Shankar Kher, filed by his son Onkar Arvind Kher (the named Executor), was GRANTED on 8th May 2026. All legal formalities were satisfied including the petitioner's oath, attesting witness affidavit, consent from the widow and daughter, and proper service of citation. The office was directed to issue Probate after verifying no cross petitions or caveats were filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts