MAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED vs SIDDHI RENT A CAR PVT. LTD AND 2 OTHER — EXA/1257/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020054152022

Filing Number

EXA/5414/2022

Filing Date

23-Feb-2022

Registration No

EXA/1257/2025

Registration Date

14-Jul-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHINDRA AND MAHINDRA FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED

    Adv. Disha Karambar and Associates

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SIDDHI RENT A CAR PVT. LTD AND 2 OTHER

  2. 2.JAGDISH BANSILAL KHURANA

  3. 3.AMARNATH RAMNATH MISHRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    —View PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside multiple arbitral awards (serial nos. 902-1151) involving Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Limited because the sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally, which the Supreme Court declared void ab initio. The court dismissed all related execution and interim applications, permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, and excluded the prior arbitration period from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 26-Jun-2025

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

  5. 26-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 23-Feb-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/1257/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside multiple arbitral awards (serial nos. 902-1151) involving Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Limited because the sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally, which the Supreme Court declared void ab initio. The court dismissed all related execution and interim applications, permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, and excluded the prior arbitration period from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case