Vinay Purshottam Bavaria vs VALLABH RAVJI PATEL — TP/2033/2026
Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM020053972026
e-Filing Number
12-02-2026
Filing Number
TP/5396/2026
Filing Date
12-Feb-2026
Registration No
TP/2033/2026
Registration Date
10-Apr-2026
Judge
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
Coram
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
Bench Type
Single
Category
TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )
Sub-Category
Probate ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vinay Purshottam Bavaria
Adv. B G Saraf
-
2.YAGNESH RAMJIBHAI PATEl
Adv. SARAF BHALCHANDRA GOVIND
Respondent(s)
-
1.VALLABH RAVJI PATEL
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
23-Apr-2026
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF
Case TP/2033/2026 Summary: The Testamentary Registrar heard the petitioners' advocate on 23 April 2026 and issued directions for procedural compliance in this testamentary matter. The court ordered the office to issue a citation and notice to the Collector, directed the advocate to file an affidavit of service and effect service on non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office, and instructed verification of any cross-petitions. The case was adjourned pending completion of compliance formalities, with liberty to list for final grant thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Apr-2026
For Direction
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
-
12-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. TP/2033/2026
Case TP/2033/2026 Summary: The Testamentary Registrar heard the petitioners' advocate on 23 April 2026 and issued directions for procedural compliance in this testamentary matter. The court ordered the office to issue a citation and notice to the Collector, directed the advocate to file an affidavit of service and effect service on non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office, and instructed verification of any cross-petitions. The case was adjourned pending completion of compliance formalities, with liberty to list for final grant thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts