CINEPOLIS INDIA PVT.LTD. vs CHIEF CONTROLLING REVENUE AUTHORITY INSPECTOR GENERAL AND ANR — CHOL/268/2026

Case under Bombay Stamps Act, 1958 Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 16th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020053932026

Filing Number

CHOL/5392/2026

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Registration No

CHOL/268/2026

Registration Date

02-Apr-2026

Judge

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Coram

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Bench Type

Division

Category

CHAMBER ORDER OS OFFICERS ( 64 )

Sub-Category

Restoration which are rejected under Rule 986 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

16-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Stamps Act, 1958 Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CINEPOLIS INDIA PVT.LTD.

    Adv. Legalserve and Associates

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHIEF CONTROLLING REVENUE AUTHORITY INSPECTOR GENERAL AND ANR

  2. 2.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

    Summary The High Court granted the Chamber Order to set aside the rejection of the petition dated 07.01.2026, condoning the 20-day delay in filing the application. The court found the petitioner's reasons for non-compliance with office objections to be bona fide and held that substantial justice cannot be denied on technical grounds. The petitioner must pay Rs. 5,000 cost within one week and remove all office objections and get the petition registered within two weeks, failing which the petition stands rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    For Hearing And Final Disposal

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CHOL/268/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court granted the Chamber Order to set aside the rejection of the petition dated 07.01.2026, condoning the 20-day delay in filing the application. The court found the petitioner's reasons for non-compliance with office objections to be bona fide and held that substantial justice cannot be denied on technical grounds. The petitioner must pay Rs. 5,000 cost within one week and remove all office objections and get the petition registered within two weeks, failing which the petition stands rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case