ACME HOUSING DESIGN LLP M P VASHI AND ASSOCIATES vs Violet Monis — HCBM20053832026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 9. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.

Next hearing 27-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM020053832026

e-Filing Number

12-02-2026

Filing Number

ARBP/5382/2026

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Bench Type

Single

Category

ARBITRATION ( 4 )

Sub-Category

Interim Relief ( 102 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ACME HOUSING DESIGN LLP M P VASHI AND ASSOCIATES

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Violet Monis

  2. 2.Judith Dsilva

    Adv. Jayesh Mestry

  3. 3.Gracey Pravin Bhabhle

    Adv. Jeetenndra Sachddev

  4. 4.Jacinta Arvind Aahir

    Adv. Jeetenndra Sachddev

  5. 5.Freeda Banta Aaloor

    Adv. Jeetenndra Sachddev

  6. 6.Cynthia Girish Mhatre

  7. 7.Letitia Padrick Dsouza

    Adv. Jeetenndra Sachddev

  8. 8.Pressy Menezes Dsouza

  9. 9.Poinnari Cooperative Housing Society Limited

    Adv. SOLICIS JVPD

Case History

  1. 27-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

  3. 27-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

    Case Summary The High Court of Bombay partly allowed Acme Housing Design LLP's arbitration petition seeking interim measures for a society redevelopment project. While 33 of 36 society members consented to redevelopment, three holdout members delayed the process. The court ordered Respondents 3-8 to vacate their flats as per the development agreement, with police assistance if needed. Respondents 1 and 2 may execute permanent alternate accommodation (PAA) agreements without prejudice to their claims; if they refuse, redevelopment funds shall be escrowed. Flat 11's amounts were directed to an escrow account pending resolution of disputes among Respondents 3-8. Arbitration must commence within 90 days or interim measures terminate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 27-Apr-2026

    Arbp-For Hearing And Final Disposal U/S 9

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

  6. 22-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

  7. 22-Apr-2026

    Arbp-For Hearing And Final Disposal U/S 9

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

  8. 17-Apr-2026

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

  9. 07-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

  10. 24-Mar-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

  11. 13-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

  12. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The High Court of Bombay partly allowed Acme Housing Design LLP's arbitration petition seeking interim measures for a society redevelopment project. While 33 of 36 society members consented to redevelopment, three holdout members delayed the process. The court ordered Respondents 3-8 to vacate their flats as per the development agreement, with police assistance if needed. Respondents 1 and 2 may execute permanent alternate accommodation (PAA) agreements without prejudice to their claims; if they refuse, redevelopment funds shall be escrowed. Flat 11's amounts were directed to an escrow account pending resolution of disputes among Respondents 3-8. Arbitration must commence within 90 days or interim measures terminate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case