Hindustan Unilever Limited Davawala and Co vs Mihir Guleria — COMIP/202/2026

Case under Trade Marks Act Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020053772026

e-Filing Number

12-02-2026

Filing Number

COMIP/5377/2026

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Registration No

COMIP/202/2026

Registration Date

01-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

Bench Type

Single

Category

MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )

Sub-Category

TRADE MARKS ( 20 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Trade Marks Act Section 1
Copyright Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Hindustan Unilever Limited Davawala and Co

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mihir Guleria

  2. 2.Ankita Guleria

  3. 3.VG Organics

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

    The Bombay High Court's Commercial Division decreed the suit filed by Hindustan Unilever Limited against Mihir Guleria, Ankita Guleria, and VG Organics on May 7, 2026, following an amicable settlement. The defendants admitted the plaintiff's prayer clauses (a)-(c) and consented to the decree; the court accepted the signed Consent Terms as undertakings. Court Receiver costs must be paid by the plaintiff within eight days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. COMIP/202/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court's Commercial Division decreed the suit filed by Hindustan Unilever Limited against Mihir Guleria, Ankita Guleria, and VG Organics on May 7, 2026, following an amicable settlement. The defendants admitted the plaintiff's prayer clauses (a)-(c) and consented to the decree; the court accepted the signed Consent Terms as undertakings. Court Receiver costs must be paid by the plaintiff within eight days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case