BD AND P HOTELS (INDIA) PVT. LTD vs HOTEL CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. — CHOL/322/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020053712026

Filing Number

CHOL/5371/2026

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Registration No

CHOL/322/2026

Registration Date

22-Apr-2026

Judge

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Coram

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Bench Type

Single

Category

CHAMBER ORDER OS OFFICERS ( 64 )

Sub-Category

Restoration which are rejected under Rule 986 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECTED

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BD AND P HOTELS (INDIA) PVT. LTD

    Adv. Negandhi Shah Himayatullah

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HOTEL CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    —View PDF

    The court rejected BD AND P HOTELS (INDIA) PVT. LTD's Chamber Order seeking to set aside a previous rejection order due to unexplained delay of 265 days in filing the restoration application. The Prothonotary found that despite extensions granted to cure office objections (deadline extended to 23.04.2025), the applicant failed to comply and subsequently filed for restoration only on 12.02.2026, with no justification provided for the delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    For Hearing And Final Disposal

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CHOL/322/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected BD AND P HOTELS (INDIA) PVT. LTD's Chamber Order seeking to set aside a previous rejection order due to unexplained delay of 265 days in filing the restoration application. The Prothonotary found that despite extensions granted to cure office objections (deadline extended to 23.04.2025), the applicant failed to comply and subsequently filed for restoration only on 12.02.2026, with no justification provided for the delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case