PAMELA VISHWANATH vs V VISHWANATH alias VISHWANATH VENKATRAMAN — TP/1198/2026
Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 278. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM020053482026
e-Filing Number
11-02-2026
Filing Number
TP/5348/2026
Filing Date
12-Feb-2026
Registration No
TP/1198/2026
Registration Date
26-Feb-2026
Judge
Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department
Coram
Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department
Bench Type
Single
Category
TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )
Sub-Category
Letters of Administration without Will ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PAMELA VISHWANATH
Adv. UTTAM S RANE
Respondent(s)
-
1.V VISHWANATH alias VISHWANATH VENKATRAMAN
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
05-May-2026
Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF
Case Summary: TP/1198/2026 Petition allowed. Pamela Vishwanath, the widow of deceased V. Vishwanath alias Vishwanath Venkatraman (died 02.02.2015), was granted Letters of Administration for the deceased's properties under the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The petition was uncontested; all legal heirs consented, and no objections were filed. The petitioner was exempted from furnishing administrative bond as the sole Class-I heir. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
For Direction
Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department
-
12-Mar-2026
Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. TP/1198/2026
Case Summary: TP/1198/2026 Petition allowed. Pamela Vishwanath, the widow of deceased V. Vishwanath alias Vishwanath Venkatraman (died 02.02.2015), was granted Letters of Administration for the deceased's properties under the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The petition was uncontested; all legal heirs consented, and no objections were filed. The petitioner was exempted from furnishing administrative bond as the sole Class-I heir. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts