Paresh Bhailalbhai Patel vs Sushila Patel alias Sushila Bhailal Patel alias Sushila Bhailalbhai Patel — TP/2371/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020053292026

e-Filing Number

12-02-2026

Filing Number

TP/5329/2026

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Registration No

TP/2371/2026

Registration Date

24-Apr-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Succession ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Paresh Bhailalbhai Patel

    Adv. Mr. Pravin D. Kadam

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sushila Patel alias Sushila Bhailal Patel alias Sushila Bhailalbhai Patel

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

    Case Summary: TP/2371/2026 The case was called for directions on 6th May 2026 before the Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar. The court directed the petitioner's advocate to issue notices to non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office, file an Affidavit of Service, furnish an Administration Bond, and verify if any cross petition exists. The matter was adjourned, with liberty granted to the petitioner to seek relisting after completing all compliance requirements and when ready for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2371/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TP/2371/2026 The case was called for directions on 6th May 2026 before the Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar. The court directed the petitioner's advocate to issue notices to non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office, file an Affidavit of Service, furnish an Administration Bond, and verify if any cross petition exists. The matter was adjourned, with liberty granted to the petitioner to seek relisting after completing all compliance requirements and when ready for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case