RASILA UPENDRA SHAH vs UPENDRA JAYANTILAL SHAH — TP/2459/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020052882026

e-Filing Number

11-02-2026

Filing Number

TP/5288/2026

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Registration No

TP/2459/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Succession ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 372

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RASILA UPENDRA SHAH

    Adv. NIKHIL S UDESHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UPENDRA JAYANTILAL SHAH

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

    Case TP/2459/2026 Summary: The testamentary petition filed by Rasila Upendra Shah was called for directions on 8th May 2026. With no petitioner present, the court directed the office to issue notices to the petitioner and any non-consenting legal heirs of the deceased via the Sheriff, Mumbai. The advocate must file an affidavit of service, effect service on non-consenting heirs, furnish an administration bond for the gross amount, and verify if any cross-petitions exist. The matter was adjourned with liberty to list for final grant after all compliance is completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2459/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case TP/2459/2026 Summary: The testamentary petition filed by Rasila Upendra Shah was called for directions on 8th May 2026. With no petitioner present, the court directed the office to issue notices to the petitioner and any non-consenting legal heirs of the deceased via the Sheriff, Mumbai. The advocate must file an affidavit of service, effect service on non-consenting heirs, furnish an administration bond for the gross amount, and verify if any cross-petitions exist. The matter was adjourned with liberty to list for final grant after all compliance is completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case