SANJOY DATTA vs SUSIM MUKUL DATTA — TP/2537/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020052372026

e-Filing Number

11-02-2026

Filing Number

TP/5236/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

TP/2537/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Probate ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANJOY DATTA

    Adv. B G Saraf

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUSIM MUKUL DATTA

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

    Case Summary: TP/2537/2026 On 8th June 2026, the Testamentary Registrar heard petitioner Sanjoy Datta's petition and issued directions for procedural compliance. The court ordered the office to issue citations and notice to the Collector, directed the advocate to file an affidavit of service and effect service on non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office, and instructed verification of any cross-petitions. The case was adjourned pending completion of these procedural steps, with liberty to list for final hearing once all compliance is satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  4. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/2537/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TP/2537/2026 On 8th June 2026, the Testamentary Registrar heard petitioner Sanjoy Datta's petition and issued directions for procedural compliance. The court ordered the office to issue citations and notice to the Collector, directed the advocate to file an affidavit of service and effect service on non-consenting legal heirs through the Sheriff's office, and instructed verification of any cross-petitions. The case was adjourned pending completion of these procedural steps, with liberty to list for final hearing once all compliance is satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case