The New India Assurance Co Ltd NALLURI MADHAVI SURENDRAKUMAR vs Ingram Micro India Pvt Ltd — IA/876/2026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 37. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

Next hearing 24-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM020051322026

e-Filing Number

10-02-2026

Filing Number

IA/5131/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

IA/876/2026

Registration Date

12-Feb-2026

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 37

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The New India Assurance Co Ltd NALLURI MADHAVI SURENDRAKUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ingram Micro India Pvt Ltd

  2. 2.Bhavitha Devaiah Proprietor Greentech Star

Case History

  1. 24-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Jun-2026

    Interim Application

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

  3. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF

    Case Summary: The Bombay High Court's Commercial Arbitration Petition challenging a July 10, 2025 Section 9 order has been disposed of after the parties reached a settlement. The court directed the parties to mention the matter urgently before the Division Bench under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to record the settlement and conclude proceedings expeditiously. The single judge recused himself from further cognizance as the petition appeals against his own earlier order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF

  5. 21-Apr-2026

    Interim Application

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/876/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Bombay High Court's Commercial Arbitration Petition challenging a July 10, 2025 Section 9 order has been disposed of after the parties reached a settlement. The court directed the parties to mention the matter urgently before the Division Bench under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to record the settlement and conclude proceedings expeditiously. The single judge recused himself from further cognizance as the petition appeals against his own earlier order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case