MURALIDHARAN RAMAMURTHY vs LOK HOUSING AND CONSTRUCTIONS LTD. AND 2 ORS. — HCBM20050592020

Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Next hearing: 16th July 2026.

Next hearing 16-Jul-2026

CNR: HCBM020050592020

Filing Number

COMEX/654/2020

Filing Date

06-Mar-2020

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MURALIDHARAN RAMAMURTHY

    Adv. Wadia Ghandy and Co.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LOK HOUSING AND CONSTRUCTIONS LTD. AND 2 ORS.

  2. 2.DARSHAN LALITKUMAR GANDHI

  3. 3.NAINA MANSUKHLAL SHAH(Legal Heir)3.

  4. 4.Asha Mehta3.

  5. 5.Kundan Arun Vora3.

  6. 6.Rekha Girish Shah3.

  7. 7.Bindu Surendranath Vukkadalal3.

  8. 8.Surendranatha Jagannathan Vukaadala

Case History

  1. 16-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jul-2026

    For Direction

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. PatilView PDF

    Case Summary: In this decree execution matter before the Bombay High Court (10 COMEX(L)/654/2020), the decree holder sought to execute a decree by selling office premises (2806.75 sq.ft.) at Lok Bhavan, Andheri, Mumbai, currently in Court Receiver's possession. The case was adjourned to 16 June 2026 with the Court Receiver directed to remain present at the next hearing; the decree holder's counsel was permitted to furnish a copy of the order to the Court Receiver's office. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 06-Mar-2020

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In this decree execution matter before the Bombay High Court (10 COMEX(L)/654/2020), the decree holder sought to execute a decree by selling office premises (2806.75 sq.ft.) at Lok Bhavan, Andheri, Mumbai, currently in Court Receiver's possession. The case was adjourned to 16 June 2026 with the Court Receiver directed to remain present at the next hearing; the decree holder's counsel was permitted to furnish a copy of the order to the Court Receiver's office. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case