L AND T FINANCE LTD. vs JANARDHAN DATTATRAY DAHIFALE AND ANR. — EXA/499/2016

Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 23-Nov-2015

CNR: HCBM020049882015

Filing Number

EXA/340/2015

Filing Date

20-Feb-2015

Registration No

EXA/499/2016

Registration Date

12-Feb-2016

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.L AND T FINANCE LTD.

    Adv. Disha Karambar and Associates

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JANARDHAN DATTATRAY DAHIFALE AND ANR.

  2. 2.SHAILENDRA SHIVAJI REPALE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    —View PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in these consolidated matters (EXA/499/2016 and others) because the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed, which is void ab initio per Supreme Court precedent. The court dismissed all execution and interim applications, while permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with time limitation periods excluded for the prior arbitration invocation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Nov-2015

    Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. MasterView PDF

  4. 23-Nov-2015

    For Direction [Original Side Matters]

    Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. Master

  5. 20-Feb-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/499/2016

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in these consolidated matters (EXA/499/2016 and others) because the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed, which is void ab initio per Supreme Court precedent. The court dismissed all execution and interim applications, while permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with time limitation periods excluded for the prior arbitration invocation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case