SHRI RAM SALVE PRO. OF GANESH CONTAINER MOVERS SYNDICATE vs M/S. MITSUI O. S. K. LINES LTD. and ORS. — S/1862/2002
Case under Advocates Act 1961 Section 30. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020048082002
Next Hearing
30th June 2026
Filing Number
S/1800/2002
Filing Date
03-06-2002
Registration No
S/1862/2002
Registration Date
05-06-2002
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Original
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHRI RAM SALVE PRO. OF GANESH CONTAINER MOVERS SYNDICATE
Adv. KK SONAWANE,PLAINTIFF,PLAINTIFF, PLAINTIFF
Respondent(s)
M/S. MITSUI O. S. K. LINES LTD. and ORS.
Adv. MULLA & MULLA(1,
1123
Hearing History
FOR DIRECTIONS
FOR MARKING OF DOCUMENTS
FOR MARKING OF DOCUMENTS
FOR MARKING OF DOCUMENTS
FOR MARKING OF DOCUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-09-2007 | FOR DIRECTIONS |
| 30-06-2026 | FOR MARKING OF DOCUMENTS |
| 23-04-2026 | FOR MARKING OF DOCUMENTS |
| 05-03-2026 | FOR MARKING OF DOCUMENTS |
| 17-01-2026 | FOR MARKING OF DOCUMENTS |
Orders
Case Summary: S/1862/2002 Shri Ram Salve v. M/S. Mitsui O.S.K. Lines Ltd. On 23rd April 2026, the Bombay High Court heard the civil suit and recorded the plaintiff's witness testimony. The Additional Affidavit of evidence (dated 12th November 2024), which had been translated into the witness's native language, was admitted and marked as Exhibit P-19. The defendants contested approximately 1000 pages of compiled documents as photocopies. The court adjourned the matter to 30th June 2026 for further marking of the plaintiff's documents and directed the plaintiff's witness to remain present at the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: S/1862/2002 Shri Ram Salve v. M/S. Mitsui O.S.K. Lines Ltd. On 23rd April 2026, the Bombay High Court heard the civil suit and recorded the plaintiff's witness testimony. The Additional Affidavit of evidence (dated 12th November 2024), which had been translated into the witness's native language, was admitted and marked as Exhibit P-19. The defendants contested approximately 1000 pages of compiled documents as photocopies. The court adjourned the matter to 30th June 2026 for further marking of the plaintiff's documents and directed the plaintiff's witness to remain present at the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts