COMMISSIONER OF CGST AND CENTRAL EXCISE NAVI MUMBAI vs Y AND ASSOCIATES — HCBM20047752022

Case under Central Excise & Salt Act Section 35G. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020047752022

e-Filing Number

16-02-2022

Filing Number

CEXA/4774/2022

Filing Date

16-Feb-2022

Judge

Shri. S. B. Bhansali (Prothonotary Senior Master))

Coram

Shri. S. B. Bhansali (Prothonotary Senior Master))

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Central Excise & Salt Act Section 35G

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.COMMISSIONER OF CGST AND CENTRAL EXCISE NAVI MUMBAI

    Adv. DHANANJAY BALKRISHNA DESHMUKH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Y AND ASSOCIATES

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice B.P. Colabawalla,hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze PooniwallaView PDF

    Case Summary Central Excise Appeal (L) No. 4774 of 2022 — The High Court of Bombay disposed of the Revenue's appeal as withdrawn on April 17, 2026. The appeal, which was previously rejected for non-removal of office objections, was restored via interim application but subsequently withdrawn by the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise because the tax effect fell below monetary limits per Board Instructions dated August 6, 2024. No costs were awarded, and the appellant is entitled to refund of court fees as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Aug-2023

    Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. MasterView PDF

  4. 31-Jul-2023

    Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. MasterView PDF

  5. 30-Jun-2023

    Shri. S. B. Bhansali (Prothonotary Senior Master))View PDF

  6. 30-Jun-2023

    For Rejection Under Rule 986

    Shri. S. B. Bhansali (Prothonotary Senior Master))

  7. 16-Feb-2022

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Central Excise Appeal (L) No. 4774 of 2022 — The High Court of Bombay disposed of the Revenue's appeal as withdrawn on April 17, 2026. The appeal, which was previously rejected for non-removal of office objections, was restored via interim application but subsequently withdrawn by the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise because the tax effect fell below monetary limits per Board Instructions dated August 6, 2024. No costs were awarded, and the appellant is entitled to refund of court fees as per rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case