KAMINI MURARI CHAVAN vs MURARI KRISHNAJI CHAVAN — TP/1391/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020047102026

e-Filing Number

07-02-2026

Filing Number

TP/4710/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

TP/1391/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Judge

Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department

Coram

Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Letters of Administration with Will ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAMINI MURARI CHAVAN

    Adv. Pushpa Thapa

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MURARI KRISHNAJI CHAVAN

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-May-2026

    Shri. D. D. Suryavanshi, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF

    Case Summary: TP/1391/2026 In this testamentary petition filed by Kamini Murari Chavan against Murari Krishnaji Chavan, the court heard arguments on 5th May 2026. The caveator's advocate submitted that a caveat has been filed and requested the office to scrutinize it under the Bombay High Court (OS) Rules, 1980, proceeding under Rule 403 if compliant or seeking directions under Rule 986 if non-compliant. The case has been adjourned to 9th July 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    For Direction

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary Department

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Shri. P.A. Jagdale, Officer On Special Duty With Testamentary DepartmentView PDF

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/1391/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TP/1391/2026 In this testamentary petition filed by Kamini Murari Chavan against Murari Krishnaji Chavan, the court heard arguments on 5th May 2026. The caveator's advocate submitted that a caveat has been filed and requested the office to scrutinize it under the Bombay High Court (OS) Rules, 1980, proceeding under Rule 403 if compliant or seeking directions under Rule 986 if non-compliant. The case has been adjourned to 9th July 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case