BHAIRULAL HIRALAL CHOWDHARI ANGAD GIRI vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND 3 ORS. — WP/321/2022

Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020046562020

Filing Number

WP/714/2020

Filing Date

02-Mar-2020

Registration No

WP/321/2022

Registration Date

17-Jan-2022

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Bench Type

Division

Category

SLUM AREAS ( 49 )

Sub-Category

Slum areas ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHAIRULAL HIRALAL CHOWDHARI ANGAD GIRI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND 3 ORS.

    Adv. RESP. NO. 1 AND 2 1123

  2. 2.THE DY. COLLECTOR (ENC. and REM.)

  3. 3.MAHATMA PHULE NAGAR (B) CHSL

  4. 4.ACE LINKS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF

    Summary: WP/321/2022 - Bhairulal Hiralal Chowdhari v. State of Maharashtra The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing Respondent No.2 (Deputy Collector) to reconsider the petitioner's pending application dated 23/05/2018 and communicate a decision, despite the State's submission that the petitioner was ineligible. The court made no substantive observations on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Due Admission - 1

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

  4. 09-Mar-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 02-Mar-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/321/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: WP/321/2022 - Bhairulal Hiralal Chowdhari v. State of Maharashtra The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing Respondent No.2 (Deputy Collector) to reconsider the petitioner's pending application dated 23/05/2018 and communicate a decision, despite the State's submission that the petitioner was ineligible. The court made no substantive observations on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case