GE MONEY FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD. ASHISH AGGARWAL vs HITESH KANTILAL KHATRI and ANR. — EXA/657/2011

Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 05-Apr-2019

CNR: HCBM020046202011

Filing Number

EXA/389/2011

Filing Date

24-Feb-2011

Registration No

EXA/657/2011

Registration Date

28-Jul-2011

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GE MONEY FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD. ASHISH AGGARWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HITESH KANTILAL KHATRI and ANR.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in these consolidated matters, finding that the sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Following Supreme Court precedent that unilateral arbitrator appointments are void ab initio, the court dismissed all execution applications and granted parties liberty to initiate fresh arbitration, with time spent in the voided proceedings excluded from limitation periods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Apr-2019

    For Dismissal Under Rule 329

    Hon'ble Shri Justice K.R. Shriram

  4. 28-Sep-2015

    —View PDF

  5. 15-Sep-2015

    —View PDF

  6. 14-Sep-2015

    —View PDF

  7. 07-Sep-2015

    —View PDF

  8. 24-Feb-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/657/2011

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in these consolidated matters, finding that the sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Following Supreme Court precedent that unilateral arbitrator appointments are void ab initio, the court dismissed all execution applications and granted parties liberty to initiate fresh arbitration, with time spent in the voided proceedings excluded from limitation periods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case