Murali Dasarath Raman vs Radhakrishnan — HCBM20045312026

Case under Administration of Estates Section 2. Disposed: DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020045312026

e-Filing Number

06-02-2026

Filing Number

MPT/4531/2026

Filing Date

07-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Bench Type

Single

Category

PERSONAL LAW ( 31 )

Sub-Category

HEIRSHIP CERTIFICATE. ( 9 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Administration of Estates Section 2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Murali Dasarath Raman

    Adv. ADVKRISHNA,Sushant Ghadage,Sushant Ghadage, ,Sushant Ghadage

  2. 2.Saroja Radhakrishnan

    Adv. K. Krishnakumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Radhakrishnan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

    The Bombay High Court allowed the petition filed by Murali Dasarath Raman (executor) and Saroja Radhakrishnan (widow) seeking a legal heirship certificate for deceased Radhakrishnan's properties and credits under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827. The court determined that Petitioner No.2 (the widow) is the sole legal heir and directed the department to issue the certificate within 3 weeks, subject to removal of any office objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    At 3.00 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  4. 07-Feb-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court allowed the petition filed by Murali Dasarath Raman (executor) and Saroja Radhakrishnan (widow) seeking a legal heirship certificate for deceased Radhakrishnan's properties and credits under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827. The court determined that Petitioner No.2 (the widow) is the sole legal heir and directed the department to issue the certificate within 3 weeks, subject to removal of any office objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case