Auxilo Finserve Pvt Ltd Tikshta Modi vs Venkata Sai Krishna Reddy Jonnala — IA/1612/2026
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section Section1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 10th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020043842026
e-Filing Number
05-02-2026
Filing Number
IA/4384/2026
Filing Date
06-Feb-2026
Registration No
IA/1612/2026
Registration Date
18-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
10-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Auxilo Finserve Pvt Ltd Tikshta Modi
Respondent(s)
-
1.Venkata Sai Krishna Reddy Jonnala
-
2.Venkatareddy Jonnala
-
3.Jonnala Vani
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Jul-2026
Due Matters - Adjourned OS-2
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF
The Bombay High Court adjourned an interim application in an execution case between Auxilo Finserve and Venkata Sai Krishna Reddy Jonnala. The respondent contended the arbitrator's appointment was unilateral, but the court accepted the applicant's argument that the appointment was made through alternate dispute resolution counsel, thus not unilateral. The matter was adjourned to 15th July 2026, with execution proceedings stayed pending resolution of Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act challenges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF
-
25-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. IA/1612/2026
The Bombay High Court adjourned an interim application in an execution case between Auxilo Finserve and Venkata Sai Krishna Reddy Jonnala. The respondent contended the arbitrator's appointment was unilateral, but the court accepted the applicant's argument that the appointment was made through alternate dispute resolution counsel, thus not unilateral. The matter was adjourned to 15th July 2026, with execution proceedings stayed pending resolution of Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act challenges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts