PALLAVI KHALE vs BRIHANMUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION — WP/714/2024

Case under Service Matter Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020043192024

Filing Number

WP/4317/2024

Filing Date

06-Feb-2024

Registration No

WP/714/2024

Registration Date

16-Feb-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Bench Type

Division

Category

LOCAL BODY SERVICE MATTERS ( 47 )

Sub-Category

Municipal Corporation ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 06-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Service Matter Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PALLAVI KHALE

    Adv. Kuldeep Rajesh Singh

  2. 2.NEETA JADHAV

  3. 3.POOJA SWAPNIL YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BRIHANMUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

    Adv. ,KOMAL PUNJABI BMC 1123

  2. 2.MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, BRIHANMUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

    Adv. PUNJABI KOMAL RAJESH

  3. 3.DEPUTY MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER (GENERAL ADMINISTRATION)

    Adv. PUNJABI KOMAL RAJESH

  4. 4.THE LAW OFFICER, BRIHANMUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

    Adv. PUNJABI KOMAL RAJESH

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak,hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

    Summary: In Writ Petition No. 714 of 2024 before the Bombay High Court, the petitioners Pallavi Khale and others sought to amend the prayer clause of their petition against the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation. The Court granted oral leave to amend the prayer clause, dispensed with re-verification requirements, and ordered the amended copy to be served on the respondents. The matter was then closed for orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak,hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

  5. 18-Aug-2025

    Due Admission - 1

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice N. R. Borkar

  6. 09-Jul-2025

    Due Admission - 1

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe

  7. 24-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF

  8. 24-Apr-2025

    Due Admission - 1

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe

  9. 17-Feb-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF

  10. 17-Feb-2025

    Due Admission - 1

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe

  11. 21-Jan-2025

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre,hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF

  12. 21-Jan-2025

    Due Admission - 1

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe

  13. 02-Jan-2025

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre,hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF

  14. 02-Jan-2025

    Due Admission - 2

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin Jamdar , Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye

  15. 02-Sep-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin Jamdar,hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. SathayeView PDF

  16. 02-Sep-2024

    Due Admission - 1

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin Jamdar , Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye

  17. 28-Mar-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin Jamdar,hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. SathayeView PDF

  18. 28-Mar-2024

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin Jamdar , Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye

  19. 29-Feb-2024

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin Jamdar,hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. SathayeView PDF

  20. 29-Feb-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  21. 06-Feb-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/714/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Writ Petition No. 714 of 2024 before the Bombay High Court, the petitioners Pallavi Khale and others sought to amend the prayer clause of their petition against the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation. The Court granted oral leave to amend the prayer clause, dispensed with re-verification requirements, and ordered the amended copy to be served on the respondents. The matter was then closed for orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case