HDFC BANK LIMITED vs PARVEZ ALAM KHALIL — EXA/1780/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020042882024

Filing Number

EXA/4286/2024

Filing Date

06-Feb-2024

Registration No

EXA/1780/2024

Registration Date

27-Jun-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HDFC BANK LIMITED

    Adv. KC AND ASSOCIATES

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PARVEZ ALAM KHALIL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    Summary: The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple matters (including HDFC Bank Limited v. Parvez Alam Khalil, EXA/1780/2024) because the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Following the Supreme Court's decision in *Bhadra International*, the court found such unilateral appointment void ab initio and dismissed all execution and connected applications. The parties are permitted to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior time period excluded from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 06-Feb-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/1780/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple matters (including HDFC Bank Limited v. Parvez Alam Khalil, EXA/1780/2024) because the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Following the Supreme Court's decision in *Bhadra International*, the court found such unilateral appointment void ab initio and dismissed all execution and connected applications. The parties are permitted to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior time period excluded from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case