RBL BANK LIMITED (KNOWN AS THE RATNAKAR BANK LTD.) vs AMIT ENTERPRISES — EXA/2441/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020041722023

Filing Number

EXA/4171/2023

Filing Date

13-Feb-2023

Registration No

EXA/2441/2025

Registration Date

13-Nov-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RBL BANK LIMITED (KNOWN AS THE RATNAKAR BANK LTD.)

    Adv. GNP Legal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AMIT ENTERPRISES

  2. 2.AMIT JAIN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    —View PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple matters (serial nos. 902-1148) because the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally, which is void ab initio under Supreme Court precedent. All execution applications and related proceedings were dismissed, but parties were permitted to initiate fresh arbitration with the prior limitation period excluded from calculation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 18-Sep-2025

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

  5. 18-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 13-Feb-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/2441/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple matters (serial nos. 902-1148) because the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally, which is void ab initio under Supreme Court precedent. All execution applications and related proceedings were dismissed, but parties were permitted to initiate fresh arbitration with the prior limitation period excluded from calculation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case