Hindustan Unilever Limited Davawala and Co vs Amber Avenue Private Limited — LPETN/54/2026

Case under Trade Marks Act Section 1. Disposed: --DISPOSED OFF on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020041712026

e-Filing Number

05-02-2026

Filing Number

LPETN/4171/2026

Filing Date

05-Feb-2026

Registration No

LPETN/54/2026

Registration Date

06-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

Bench Type

Single

Category

MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )

Sub-Category

TRADE MARKS ( 20 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Trade Marks Act Section 1
Copyright Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Hindustan Unilever Limited Davawala and Co

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Amber Avenue Private Limited

  2. 2.Aegis Detergent Industries

  3. 3.Shree Durga Detergent Products

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jul-2026

    Due Matters - Adjourned OS

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

  3. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

    The Bombay High Court decreed Hindustan Unilever's trademark and copyright infringement suit against Amber Avenue and Aegis Detergent following an amicable settlement. The court granted perpetual injunctions restraining defendants from infringing HUL's registered Splat logo trademarks and Surf Excel artistic works/packaging through identical or deceptively similar marks, logos, or trade dress in detergent products, and from passing off defendants' goods as HUL's. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. LPETN/54/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court decreed Hindustan Unilever's trademark and copyright infringement suit against Amber Avenue and Aegis Detergent following an amicable settlement. The court granted perpetual injunctions restraining defendants from infringing HUL's registered Splat logo trademarks and Surf Excel artistic works/packaging through identical or deceptively similar marks, logos, or trade dress in detergent products, and from passing off defendants' goods as HUL's. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case