SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED) vs ABULKALAM HASAN ANSARI — EXA/1058/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020041592024

Filing Number

EXA/4157/2024

Filing Date

05-Feb-2024

Registration No

EXA/1058/2025

Registration Date

14-May-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED)

    Adv. adv amol shinde

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ABULKALAM HASAN ANSARI

  2. 2.FAIZ SHAMSHAD KHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    —View PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in these consolidated matters (including Serial No. 1058) because the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally, rendering the appointment void ab initio per the Supreme Court's Bhadra International decision. The court dismissed the execution applications and permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded, unless there was an express written agreement waiving the ineligibility objection under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 05-Feb-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/1058/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in these consolidated matters (including Serial No. 1058) because the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally, rendering the appointment void ab initio per the Supreme Court's Bhadra International decision. The court dismissed the execution applications and permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded, unless there was an express written agreement waiving the ineligibility objection under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case