RBL BANK LIMITED THROUGH C.A. NISHANT TRIVEDI vs ASMI PRINT AND MERCHANDISE PRIVATE LIMITED — EXA/2313/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020041522023

Filing Number

EXA/4151/2023

Filing Date

13-Feb-2023

Registration No

EXA/2313/2025

Registration Date

17-Oct-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RBL BANK LIMITED THROUGH C.A. NISHANT TRIVEDI

    Adv. GNP Legal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASMI PRINT AND MERCHANDISE PRIVATE LIMITED

  2. 2.SHYAM HIRAMAN PAWAR

  3. 3.ASMITA SHYAM PAWAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    —View PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in these consolidated cases, finding that the sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Following Supreme Court precedent that unilateral arbitrator appointments are void ab initio, the court dismissed all execution and connected applications. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the limitation period excluded, and allowed relief only if parties had express written agreements waiving objections under Section 12(5) of the Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 18-Sep-2025

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

  5. 18-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 13-Feb-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/2313/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in these consolidated cases, finding that the sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Following Supreme Court precedent that unilateral arbitrator appointments are void ab initio, the court dismissed all execution and connected applications. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the limitation period excluded, and allowed relief only if parties had express written agreements waiving objections under Section 12(5) of the Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case