RBL BANK LIMITED vs VARDHAMAN AGENCY — EXA/2312/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020041372023

Filing Number

EXA/4136/2023

Filing Date

13-Feb-2023

Registration No

EXA/2312/2025

Registration Date

17-Oct-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RBL BANK LIMITED

    Adv. GNP Legal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VARDHAMAN AGENCY

  2. 2.BHUSHAN NAVNEETLAL BORA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    —View PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in consolidated proceedings involving RBL Bank Limited against Vardhaman Agency and Bhushan Navneetlal Bora, finding the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and void ab initio per Supreme Court precedent. The court dismissed all related execution and interim applications, permitting fresh arbitration proceedings with time already spent excluded from limitation periods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 18-Sep-2025

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

  5. 18-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 13-Feb-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/2312/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in consolidated proceedings involving RBL Bank Limited against Vardhaman Agency and Bhushan Navneetlal Bora, finding the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and void ab initio per Supreme Court precedent. The court dismissed all related execution and interim applications, permitting fresh arbitration proceedings with time already spent excluded from limitation periods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case