SILKY SARVESH MEHTA NEE SILKY BHAWARLAL KOTHARI - APPLICANT ASHOK R PANDE, ASHOK R PANDE vs TRADE WORLD PREMISES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. AND 3 ORS. — IA/2926/2021

Case under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section 226. Next hearing: 21st July 2026.

Next hearing 21-Jul-2026

CNR: HCBM020041372021

Filing Number

IA/4116/2021

Filing Date

10-Feb-2021

Registration No

IA/2926/2021

Registration Date

26-Nov-2021

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SILKY SARVESH MEHTA NEE SILKY BHAWARLAL KOTHARI - APPLICANT ASHOK R PANDE, ASHOK R PANDE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TRADE WORLD PREMISES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. AND 3 ORS.

Case History

  1. 21-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 21-Jul-2026

    Interim Application

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    Interim Application

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

  4. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: IA/2926/2021 The case was adjourned to 17/06/2026 at the petitioner's request to file additional documents relevant to the writ petition. The existing interim order continues in effect, and the petitioner must serve copies of the deemed conveyance document on the respondent's counsel in advance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 05-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Feb-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/2926/2021

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: IA/2926/2021 The case was adjourned to 17/06/2026 at the petitioner's request to file additional documents relevant to the writ petition. The existing interim order continues in effect, and the petitioner must serve copies of the deemed conveyance document on the respondent's counsel in advance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case