Ahmed Buhari MZM LEGAL LLP vs STATE BANK OF INDIA — S/67/2026

Case under Specific Relief (Amendment) Act Section 34. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020040252026

e-Filing Number

04-02-2026

Filing Number

S/4025/2026

Filing Date

04-Feb-2026

Registration No

S/67/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Judge

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Coram

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Bench Type

Single

Category

SUITS ( 38 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief (Amendment) Act Section 34
Indian Contract Act 1872

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ahmed Buhari MZM LEGAL LLP

  2. 2.Mutiara Energy Holdings

    Adv. MZM LEGAL LLP

  3. 3.PRECIOUS ENERGY HOLDINGS

    Adv. MZM LEGAL LLP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE BANK OF INDIA

  2. 2.PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK

  3. 3.CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA

  4. 4.UCO BANK

  5. 5.INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK

  6. 6.Housing and Urban Development Corporation Ltd

  7. 7.Indian Bank

  8. 8.IFCI LIMITED

  9. 9.Union Bank of India

  10. 10.Bank of India

  11. 11.Bank of Baroda

  12. 12.THE JAMMU AND KASHMIR BANK LTD

  13. 13.Canara Bank

  14. 14.Tamil Nadu Mercantile Bank Ltd

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

    Case Summary: S/67/2026 On 8th June 2026, the court adjourned the case for directions. No plaintiff representative appeared. The court directed the plaintiff's advocate to file an Affidavit of Service proving proper service of the Writ of Summons on defendants by 22.06.2026, with a warning that failure to comply will result in suit dismissal under O.S. Rule 87. Case stood over to 22.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    For Direction

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

  4. 04-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. S/67/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: S/67/2026 On 8th June 2026, the court adjourned the case for directions. No plaintiff representative appeared. The court directed the plaintiff's advocate to file an Affidavit of Service proving proper service of the Writ of Summons on defendants by 22.06.2026, with a warning that failure to comply will result in suit dismissal under O.S. Rule 87. Case stood over to 22.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case