Hindustan Unilever Limited Davawala and Co vs Amber Avenue Private Limited Advocate - Pratik K Shah, ,Pratik K Shah,Pratik K Shah,Pratik K Shah — COMIP/226/2026
Case under Trade Marks Act Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM020039732026
e-Filing Number
03-02-2026
Filing Number
COMIP/3973/2026
Filing Date
04-Feb-2026
Registration No
COMIP/226/2026
Registration Date
10-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh
Bench Type
Single
Category
MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )
Sub-Category
TRADE MARKS ( 20 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Hindustan Unilever Limited Davawala and Co
Respondent(s)
-
1.Amber Avenue Private Limited Advocate - Pratik K Shah, ,Pratik K Shah,Pratik K Shah,Pratik K Shah
-
2.Aegis Detergent Industries
Adv. Pratik K Shah
-
3.Shree Durga Detergent Products
Adv. Pratik K Shah
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF
Case Summary: COMIP/226/2026 The Bombay High Court granted a decree in favor of Hindustan Unilever Limited against Amber Avenue Private Limited and others following an amicable settlement. The court issued perpetual injunctions restraining defendants from infringing HUL's registered Splat logo trademarks, manufacturing/selling detergent products with identical or deceptively similar packaging/artwork to Surf Excel products, and passing off goods as HUL's. The court discharged the appointed court receiver and directed the plaintiff to pay receiver costs within 8 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. COMIP/226/2026
Case Summary: COMIP/226/2026 The Bombay High Court granted a decree in favor of Hindustan Unilever Limited against Amber Avenue Private Limited and others following an amicable settlement. The court issued perpetual injunctions restraining defendants from infringing HUL's registered Splat logo trademarks, manufacturing/selling detergent products with identical or deceptively similar packaging/artwork to Surf Excel products, and passing off goods as HUL's. The court discharged the appointed court receiver and directed the plaintiff to pay receiver costs within 8 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts