ASMA MAQSOOD SOLANKI (WD/O MAQSOOD AHMED SOLANKI) vs THE MAHARASHTRA HOUSING AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (MHADA) AND 3 ORS. — IA/759/2026
Case under Mah. Housing & Area Devolopment Act Section 1. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020039202026
Filing Number
IA/3920/2026
Filing Date
04-Feb-2026
Registration No
IA/759/2026
Registration Date
06-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
Bench Type
Division
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 07-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ASMA MAQSOOD SOLANKI (WD/O MAQSOOD AHMED SOLANKI)
Adv. Judicare Law Associates ,Judicare Law Associates,Judicare Law Associates, ,Judicare Law Associates
-
2.FARIDA MAAZ MITHA (D/O MAQSOOD AHMED SOLANKI)
Adv. Judicare Law Associates
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE MAHARASHTRA HOUSING AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (MHADA) AND 3 ORS.
-
2.THE MBR AND R BOARD
-
3.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
-
4.DHANWADI MOHALLA MOSQUE WAKF
-
5.A1 HAMD DEVELOPERS
Case History
-
10-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Apr-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak
-
24-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. ChandakView PDF
Summary: In Interim Application No. 759 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, the case involving Asma Maqsood Solanki against MHADA and others has been adjourned. The matter was stood over to 10th April 2026 at the request of the petitioner's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. IA/759/2026
Summary: In Interim Application No. 759 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, the case involving Asma Maqsood Solanki against MHADA and others has been adjourned. The matter was stood over to 10th April 2026 at the request of the petitioner's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts