Suresh Amrutlal Rathod vs Amrutlal Bhikhalal Rathod — TP/1723/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 370. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020039122026

e-Filing Number

03-02-2026

Filing Number

TP/3912/2026

Filing Date

04-Feb-2026

Registration No

TP/1723/2026

Registration Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Coram

Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Succession ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 370

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Suresh Amrutlal Rathod

    Adv. Chirag Unadkat

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Amrutlal Bhikhalal Rathod

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

    Summary: The case (38 TP/1723/2026) was called for directions before the Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar on 15th April, 2026. The court directed the office to issue notices to the petitioner and non-consenting legal heirs of the deceased through the Sheriff, Mumbai, and instructed the advocate to file an Affidavit of Service and furnish an Administration Bond as per Bombay High Court Rules. The matter was adjourned with liberty to the petitioner to seek listing after all compliance requirements are fulfilled and the case is ready for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    For Direction

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

  4. 04-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/1723/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The case (38 TP/1723/2026) was called for directions before the Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar on 15th April, 2026. The court directed the office to issue notices to the petitioner and non-consenting legal heirs of the deceased through the Sheriff, Mumbai, and instructed the advocate to file an Affidavit of Service and furnish an Administration Bond as per Bombay High Court Rules. The matter was adjourned with liberty to the petitioner to seek listing after all compliance requirements are fulfilled and the case is ready for final grant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case