PRABHA P. SHENAI (SR. CITIZEN) THROUGH C.A. PRAKASH R. SHENAI (APPLICANT) vs OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR OF MS CROWN MARITIME CO(I) LTD AND ANR. — HCBM20038772026
Case under Companies Act & Rules 1956 Section 1. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020038772026
Filing Number
IA/3877/2026
Filing Date
04-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRABHA P. SHENAI (SR. CITIZEN) THROUGH C.A. PRAKASH R. SHENAI (APPLICANT)
Respondent(s)
-
1.OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR OF MS CROWN MARITIME CO(I) LTD AND ANR.
-
2.HARENDRA SINGH BISHT
Case History
-
17-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF
Case Summary: The High Court of Bombay dismissed Interim Application No. 3877 of 2026 for non-compliance with procedural requirements. The applicant sought to amend the title from "Prabha P. Shenai" to "Prakash Raghunath Shenai" in the underlying company petition, but the court found the application lacked proper averments and was not filed in the required format. The court ordered both interim applications be taken up after proper numbering and compliance with procedural rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF
-
10-Apr-2026
Due Matters - Adjourned OS
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor
-
06-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF
-
06-Mar-2026
For Direction
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor
-
16-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF
-
16-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF
-
04-Feb-2026
Case filed
Case Summary: The High Court of Bombay dismissed Interim Application No. 3877 of 2026 for non-compliance with procedural requirements. The applicant sought to amend the title from "Prabha P. Shenai" to "Prakash Raghunath Shenai" in the underlying company petition, but the court found the application lacked proper averments and was not filed in the required format. The court ordered both interim applications be taken up after proper numbering and compliance with procedural rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts