PRAKASH RAGHUNATH SHENAI vs OFFCIAL LIQUIDATOR OF M/S CROWN MARITIME CO. LTD. — HCBM20038762026
Case under Companies Act & Rules 1956 Section 1. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020038762026
Filing Number
IA/3876/2026
Filing Date
04-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor
Bench Type
Single
Category
COMPANY LAW, MRTP AND ALLIED ( 6 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRAKASH RAGHUNATH SHENAI
Respondent(s)
-
1.OFFCIAL LIQUIDATOR OF M/S CROWN MARITIME CO. LTD.
-
2.HARENDRA SINGH BISHT (ORG. PETITIONER)
Case History
-
17-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF
Case Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed Interim Application No. 3877 of 2026 for non-compliance with procedural format requirements. The applicant sought to amend the title from "Prabha P. Shenai" to "Prakash Raghunath Shenai" in the underlying company petition, but the court found the application lacked proper averments and did not follow prescribed procedures. The court directed that both Interim Applications Nos. 3876 and 3877 of 2026 be taken up for consideration only after proper numbering and reformatting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF
-
10-Apr-2026
Due Matters - Adjourned OS
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor
-
06-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF
-
06-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF
-
04-Feb-2026
Case filed
Case Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed Interim Application No. 3877 of 2026 for non-compliance with procedural format requirements. The applicant sought to amend the title from "Prabha P. Shenai" to "Prakash Raghunath Shenai" in the underlying company petition, but the court found the application lacked proper averments and did not follow prescribed procedures. The court directed that both Interim Applications Nos. 3876 and 3877 of 2026 be taken up for consideration only after proper numbering and reformatting. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts