ANIRUDHA BHAVNIPRASAD AGARWALTHROUGH THEIR POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER UMEKAR AND CO vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH MINISTRY OF HOUSING — HCBM20038552025

Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.

Next hearing 01-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM020038552025

Filing Number

WP/3856/2025

Filing Date

05-Feb-2025

Judge

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Coram

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Bench Type

Division

Category

SLUM AREAS ( 49 )

Sub-Category

Slum areas ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 05-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANIRUDHA BHAVNIPRASAD AGARWALTHROUGH THEIR POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER UMEKAR AND CO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH MINISTRY OF HOUSING

  2. 2.SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY

  3. 3.GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL COMMITTEE

  4. 4.THE ADDL. COLLECTOR (ENC AND REM) ALIAS APPELLANT AUTHORITY

  5. 5.THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR (ENC AND REM) ALIAS COMPETENT AUTHORITY BORIVALI-

  6. 6.ARJUN NIWAS SRA CO-OP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD

  7. 7.PRATEETI CONSTRUCTION LLP

  8. 8.SUNIL SHIVRAM JADHAV

Case History

  1. 01-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

    Summary: The Bombay High Court issued a conditional order on 12 writ petitions (WP(L)/3228/2025 through WP(L)/3879/2025) that were subject to rejection under O.S. Rule 986. The court granted petitioners a final opportunity to remove office objections and get the petitions registered by filing a compliance praecipe on or before 15.04.2026. The petitions will stand rejected for non-compliance if the appellants fail to comply with this directive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    For Rejection Under Rule 986

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

  4. 05-Feb-2025

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Bombay High Court issued a conditional order on 12 writ petitions (WP(L)/3228/2025 through WP(L)/3879/2025) that were subject to rejection under O.S. Rule 986. The court granted petitioners a final opportunity to remove office objections and get the petitions registered by filing a compliance praecipe on or before 15.04.2026. The petitions will stand rejected for non-compliance if the appellants fail to comply with this directive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case