SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED)) vs ARCHANA H MISHRA — EXA/1306/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section RULE 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM020037902025
Filing Number
EXA/3791/2025
Filing Date
05-Feb-2025
Registration No
EXA/1306/2025
Registration Date
16-Jul-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Bench Type
Single
Category
EXECUTION ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED (PREVIOUSLY KNOWN AS SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED))
Adv. NIYAM
Respondent(s)
-
1.ARCHANA H MISHRA
-
2.RAVIRAJ RAJENDRA GUPTA (GUARANTOR)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Case Summary: EXA/1306/2025 The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in this batch of matters (Serial Nos. 902-1151) involving Shriram Finance Limited against Archana H Mishra and Raviraj Rajendra Gupta, finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and therefore void ab initio. Following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International, the court dismissed all connected execution and interim applications. The parties are permitted to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded, unless they hold a written agreement waiving objections under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
-
05-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. EXA/1306/2025
Case Summary: EXA/1306/2025 The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in this batch of matters (Serial Nos. 902-1151) involving Shriram Finance Limited against Archana H Mishra and Raviraj Rajendra Gupta, finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and therefore void ab initio. Following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International, the court dismissed all connected execution and interim applications. The parties are permitted to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded, unless they hold a written agreement waiving objections under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts