The New India Assurance Co Ltd NALLURI MADHAVI SURENDRAKUMAR vs Ingram Micro India Pvt Ltd Advocate - K and P LEGAL COMBINE LLP — HCBM20037762026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 37. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020037762026

e-Filing Number

02-02-2026

Filing Number

CARBP/3776/2026

Filing Date

03-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

Bench Type

Single

Category

ARBITRATION ( 4 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 37

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The New India Assurance Co Ltd NALLURI MADHAVI SURENDRAKUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ingram Micro India Pvt Ltd Advocate - K and P LEGAL COMBINE LLP

  2. 2.Bhavitha Devaiah Proprietor Greentech Star

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Bombay heard a Commercial Arbitration Petition filed by New India Assurance Co Ltd challenging an earlier Section 9 order dated July 10, 2025. The court noted the petition should properly be heard by a Division Bench under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Since the parties have reached a settlement, the court granted them liberty to mention the matter urgently before the appropriate Division Bench to record the settlement and dispose of the petition expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Section 37 OS

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

  4. 03-Feb-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Bombay heard a Commercial Arbitration Petition filed by New India Assurance Co Ltd challenging an earlier Section 9 order dated July 10, 2025. The court noted the petition should properly be heard by a Division Bench under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Since the parties have reached a settlement, the court granted them liberty to mention the matter urgently before the appropriate Division Bench to record the settlement and dispose of the petition expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case