SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED vs TEJPRATAP OMPRAKASH SINGH — EXA/1163/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020036792024

Filing Number

EXA/3678/2024

Filing Date

02-Feb-2024

Registration No

EXA/1163/2024

Registration Date

04-Jun-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED

    Adv. Aarti M Kulkarni Khadilkar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TEJPRATAP OMPRAKASH SINGH

  2. 2.SATYAPRAKASH RAMSANGH SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple matters (including SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED vs. TEJPRATAP OMPRAKASH SINGH and SATYAPRAKASH RAMSANGH SINGH) because the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed, rendering the awards void ab initio per Supreme Court precedent. The court dismissed execution applications and permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior arbitration period excluded from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 02-Feb-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/1163/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple matters (including SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED vs. TEJPRATAP OMPRAKASH SINGH and SATYAPRAKASH RAMSANGH SINGH) because the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed, rendering the awards void ab initio per Supreme Court precedent. The court dismissed execution applications and permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior arbitration period excluded from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case