HH Vikramsingh son of HH Raja Digvijaysingh DIVYA SHAH ASSOCIATES vs Raja Digvijaysingh alias Digvijay Singh alias Digvijay Singhji — TP/1100/2026

Case under Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276. Disposed: Uncontested--GRANT ISSUED on 08th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM020035182026

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

31-01-2026

Filing Number

TP/3518/2026

Filing Date

31-01-2026

Registration No

TP/1100/2026

Registration Date

18-02-2026

Judge

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Coram

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Bench Type

Single

Category

TESTAMENTARY ( 63 )

Sub-Category

Probate ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

08th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--GRANT ISSUED

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276

Petitioner(s)

HH Vikramsingh son of HH Raja Digvijaysingh DIVYA SHAH ASSOCIATES

Respondent(s)

Raja Digvijaysingh alias Digvijay Singh alias Digvijay Singhji

Hearing History

Judge: Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

20-02-2026

FOR DIRECTION

Orders

20-02-2026
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar
17-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV
23-04-2026
Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary Registrar

Case Summary: TP/1100/2026 The court granted HH Vikramsingh's petition for probate of Raja Digvijaysingh's will executed on 08.11.1985. The petitioner, named executor in the will, satisfied all legal requirements including producing death certificate, consent affidavits from all legal heirs, and substitute witness affidavits under Rule 384 since original witnesses had expired. The court directed the office to issue probate after verifying no cross-petitions or caveats were filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: TP/1100/2026 The court granted HH Vikramsingh's petition for probate of Raja Digvijaysingh's will executed on 08.11.1985. The petitioner, named executor in the will, satisfied all legal requirements including producing death certificate, consent affidavits from all legal heirs, and substitute witness affidavits under Rule 384 since original witnesses had expired. The court directed the office to issue probate after verifying no cross-petitions or caveats were filed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Indian Succession Act, 1925 All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case