SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED vs MOHD ABID NASEEM QURESHI (PROP ISA TOURS TRAVELS ) (BORROWER ) AND ANR — EXA/1209/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 23rd April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020035102024

Filing Number

EXA/3509/2024

Filing Date

31-Jan-2024

Registration No

EXA/1209/2024

Registration Date

05-Jun-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

23-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED

    Adv. Sudhir Upadhyay

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MOHD ABID NASEEM QURESHI (PROP ISA TOURS TRAVELS ) (BORROWER ) AND ANR

  2. 2.MOHD NAZIR NASEEM QURESHI (GUARANTOR)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple cases (including Shriram Finance v. Qureshi) where the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally, following Supreme Court precedent that such appointments are void ab initio. The court dismissed all related execution applications and permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, excluding the prior limitation period from the calculation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 31-Jan-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/1209/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple cases (including Shriram Finance v. Qureshi) where the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally, following Supreme Court precedent that such appointments are void ab initio. The court dismissed all related execution applications and permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, excluding the prior limitation period from the calculation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case